W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: #428 Accept-Language ordering for identical qvalues

From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:26:25 +0900
Message-ID: <50F7B5B1.5050400@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hello Julian,

On 2013/01/17 0:56, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2119#file1>,
> the spec now says:
>
> "If no quality values are assigned or multiple language tags have been
> assigned the same quality, the same-weighted languages are listed in
> descending order of priority."
>
> This is a change from both RFC 2068 and RFC 2616 which we *did* discuss
> back in the thread starting with <​
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2011OctDec/0223.html>;
> back then we decided not to make this change because we know of
> implementations ignoring the ordering, and no convincing argument was
> given for making the ordering significant.

We also know of implementations, both on the sender and on the receiver 
side (as far as I remember) that use ordering. So maybe something like:

"If no quality values are assigned or multiple language tags have been
assigned the same quality, the same-weighted languages may be listed in
descending order of priority."

I'm sure somebody can come up with better wording, but I hope you get 
the idea.

Regards,   Martin.

> I believe this change should be backed out.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 08:27:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 17 January 2013 08:27:04 GMT