- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:47:54 +1100
- To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 17/01/2013, at 11:25 AM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: >> If we're doing compression, we're associating state with connections anyway. > > As long as it's transparent and hop-by-hop, it works. That would work > dates, huh. The other factor is that if it's connection-specific, each hop will have to keep that state and properly translate it to the next one, introducing the possibility for errors. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 00:48:21 UTC