W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Multiple header fields with the same field name - unwritten assumption about quoted commas in values?

From: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:29:25 -0600
Message-ID: <CACuKZqFHMNK8yEiq1eJ-JyOk+gSL-Eh=CJyqUTjUSVJvmO55PQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Piotr Dobrogost <p@ietf.dobrogost.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 2013-01-16 00:38, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
>>> I guess what Nico had in mind is if this subject could be clarified in
>>> 2.0 so that we won't have problems we have now in the future.
>> What problem, exactly?
>> Given a valid message, you can combine header fields as specified in the
>> spec. But you don't have to.
> You shouldn't if you're a middlebox.

On the server side, it is a good idea to merge headers. There's no
point for a server framework to return multiple values for one header
name - application will have to merge them anyway before parsing.
(Java Servlet for example does not merge headers; it's a source of
bug; fortunately clients usually don't split headers)

On the client side, it's probably the same story (except Set-Cookie)

Zhong Yu
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2013 01:29:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:09 UTC