Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback

Done! http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-http-prefer-18.txt


On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> > How about this:
> >
> > OLD
> > Doing so, however, results in a variety of issues affecting the
> > cacheability of responses.
> >
> > NEW
> > But any mechanism that alters the URI can have undesirable effects,
> > such as when caches record the altered URI.
>
> This, along with Julian's comments, are all the changes we've gotten
> so far.  Not wanting to distract from httpbis chartered work, but
> unless there are other comments now...
>
> ...I'd like James to put in a revised I-D, and then I'd like to click
> the "approve" button.  Any objections to that plan?
>
> James, there's currently a bug in the automated submission tool, so
> let's wait until early next week for that to be fixed and to see if
> anyone responds to this note.  Then go ahead and fire off a revised
> I-D.  I'll change the document state to "Revised I-D Needed" now.
>
> Barry
>

Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 20:01:41 UTC