W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Questions on Frame Size

From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
cc: "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1306201809370.21683@egate.xpasc.com>


On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Amos Jeffries wrote:
 
> Which implies that server-push is a different protocol to HTTP already.

Different from 1.1, but a new feature of 2.0

 
> IIRC: the 64K limit is for next-generation requirements of systems running
> HTTP at TB speeds. Allowing new frames to be added for those larger line rates
> is very useful given they are already on the horizon and HTTP/2.0 has long
> lifetime ahead.

In the SF Interim, we agreed to 64K/16K (frame/vs HTTP) to allow for the 
larger frame required to establish a TLS connection without added round
trips because the initial TLS setup exceeded a single frame. 
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 01:15:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:13 UTC