W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013


From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:20:40 +0000
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
Message-ID: <61029.1371630040@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <alpine.LRH.2.01.1306181554210.26747@egate.xpasc.com>, David Morris 

>OTOH ... I'm having real difficulty understanding why either side would
>declare "don't come back" when the detected issue wasn't severe enough
>to reset the connection with a PROTOCOL_ERROR.

Policy decisions ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 08:21:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:13 UTC