W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: p2: Expectation extensions

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 19:30:27 +1000
Message-Id: <0A8E2A53-CFB7-4152-8F44-79D3719090A1@mnot.net>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
The subsequent conversation doesn't demonstrate a lot of consensus here, so I'm happy to drop this issue. Any objection to that?


On 23/04/2013, at 5:22 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> p2 5.1.1 requires that an unrecognised expectation be replied to with a 417 Expectation Failed. 
> 
> In my testing, it's fairly common for servers to ignore an unregistered expectation (e.g., "foo"). 
> 
> Given how many problems we already have with Expect, should we consider disallowing further extensions here, and removing this requirement?

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 09:30:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 18 November 2019 18:01:32 UTC