W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Design Issue: GZIP flag on DATA Frames

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 20:52:53 +0000
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
cc: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <5267.1369169573@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <fnlnp8t14lal0uk5suouc2uuk3uk4429dt@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>, Bjoer
n Hoehrmann writes:

>>And what is the plausibility that any new compression schemes will ever
>>make that worth-while ?

>[...] something like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.xz is quite near
>a point where I would expect people to call for adoption of a new scheme
>(with a filter optimized for such content > 10% better compression seems
>very plausible to me).

You forgot half the "worth-while" part:  The compatibility issues.

Even something as trivial as "deflate" vs. "gzip" was too hard for
some people to get right.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 20:53:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:13 UTC