W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Design Issue: GZIP flag on DATA Frames

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:47:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbePCcbdQvy0=3iiwqyXxnn1M8W+RQzWNEBjX48i3+taxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Actually, my apologies, for some reason my brain did not register the
"allowed to used the '-0' uncompressed mode" in your first note. The
approach you suggest could definitely work, I think.

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> In message <CABP7RbeuieZ_tT=8ej6sQi94nRC79=rF1Fy8H_hNFhvH2_A7OA@mail.gmail.com>
> , James M Snell writes:
>
>>Well... if I know that I'm sending a file that is already compressed,
>>why should I be required to attempt running it through the compressor
>>again?
>
> Why would you do that if it is already compressed ?
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 16:48:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:13 UTC