W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Proposal: New Frame Size Text (was: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items)

From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 18:27:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNriq4nJ2dapTF2RM_f+70epe+oot8bSB0VHKnJ8S07Siw@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, William Chan (陈智昌)
<willchan@chromium.org>wrote:

> That's kinda why I don't really want to take this change as is now. I'd
> rather wait for more implementation experience. AFAICT, we have at least 3
> very large scale SPDY server deployments (Google, Twitter, and Facebook),
> and none of them have yet asked for this to be fixed. Maybe they're fine
> with just not calling read() in these situations. I'd rather wait for
> people deploying SPDY & HTTP/2.0 draft implementations to come back and say
> that this is actually a problem and we need to fix it.
>
>
+1 for running code.

We're at a point where most changes should be influenced by that; imo.
Received on Monday, 13 May 2013 22:27:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:13 UTC