- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 20:27:45 +0000
- To: William Chan (???) <willchan@chromium.org>
- cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Hasan Khalil <hkhalil@google.com>
In message <CAA4WUYijhOjJ1fo7VhUD6ezsOGO9P5q9M=q_p8J3CiDawG3bjg@mail.gmail.com> , =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= writes: >I'd like to see a >proxy/server implementer (PHK has already voiced some support) champion >this. Well, sorry to disappoint you, but I'm down to trying to reduce the damage where and if I can. The current proposal is about as far away form how I would like to see HTTP/2.0 look as it can be: Speculative, Complex, far too many parameters and not in any way streamlined for high-speed hardware based routing and processing. In other words: The archetypical result of engineering by committee to solve yesterdays problems. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 13 May 2013 20:28:09 UTC