W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 20:56:59 +0000
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
cc: (wrong string) ™ˆ™˜Œ) <willchan@chromium.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2005.1368046619@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CABP7Rbc8rs4-ktyGKwVxVC4MztcvYtARqBDoyEBYujfcpo4YDw@mail.gmail.com>
, James M Snell writes:

>Going back through this, here's a counter proposal:
>
>Let's get rid of the 8192 frame size rule and simply say that the
>maximum size for all DATA, HEADERS, HEADERS+PRIORITY and PUSH_PROMISE
>frames is either 65,535 or the current flow control WINDOW_SIZE,
>whichever is less.

Hmm, *now* you're talking...

I like it.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 20:57:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:13 UTC