- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:12:27 +1000
- To: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
On 26/04/2013, at 7:02 PM, Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm joining in late and have to second what Lars and other pointed out on that topic in respect of letting TCP do its job. > > On 04/15/2013 08:04 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> As for my opinion about what to do: I think we should delete this >>> TCP congestion window setting from HTTP/2.0. >>> >>> This is as out of scope as I’ve ever seen at the IETF. Modifying >>> TCP (by modifying its contract to upper layers such as HTTP, and by >>> modifying its state machine) is not something that can be done >>> outside of the Transport Area. I’m cc-ing Lars Eggert and Martin >>> Stiemerling (former and current Transport ADs), in case they have >>> additional comments or clarifications. >> >> I'd love to hear what Transport folks have to say on-list. >> >> I've also been talking with the Martin about having more Transport >> cross-fertilisation; we're hoping to spend some time on discussing >> relevant issues in Berlin. > > I wonder if we should have a HTTPbis presentation and discussion of the issue the HTTPbis WG faces to the TCPM group at the IETF in Berlin, sort of a joint session? Makes sense to me. I'm happy to give some time in the HTTPbis session to this, or we could schedule a separate joint meeting. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 27 April 2013 06:12:54 UTC