Re: Design Issue: PUSH_PROMISE and Stream Priority from Patrick McManus on 2013-04-26 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2013)

From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:20:59 -0700
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrgc2Wq=YYHXyeNqQo9WGBE0rBHj9NPw8w2ZQsF8jisUA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:29 PM, William Chan (陈智昌)
<willchan@chromium.org>wrote:

>  A reprioritization frame would enable the client to send advisory
> priorities here to better inform the server. And I would recommend we allow
> clients to do so.
>
>
+1. For the stage we are at now, let's just do that.

Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 15:21:26 UTC