W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication

From: 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:49:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYjGaZRVm3NtmT5qO3j7QKNZZiX7zBEV-pDhK0VGGSxuUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yep, but no, it hasn't gone anywhere.


On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi William,
>
> Is this draft by Roberto Peon the one you were referring to?
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rpeon-httpbis-exproxy-00
>
> Has this gone anywhere?
>
> I'm looking to design and build a "trusted proxy" that aligns with the
> browser development roadmap/vision in order to provide web acceleration
> functionality and so would like to get involved in this process if still
> active.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:57 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org
> > wrote:
>
>> On the contrary, I think it's great to have multiple proposals. If you
>> have your own vision for how this should work, please send it out! :) My
>> statement was simply an FYI, not a "back off, we've got this!"
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Perfect then I'll sit tight.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:43 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <
>>> willchan@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> FYI, we (google spdy team) have been discussing a "trusted proxy"
>>>> internally and I think Roberto's got a draft in the works.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>>
>>>>> Earlier this group discussed the idea of a "trusted proxy". Does that
>>>>> fall under the HTTP/2.0 category?
>>>>>
>>>>> I may have some cycles for this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. HTTP/2.0
>>>>>> 2. New HTTP authentication schemes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As per our charter <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0:
>>>>>>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/Http2Proposals>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But none yet for authentication schemes:
>>>>>>  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/HttpAuthProposals>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June,
>>>>>> 2012. It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a
>>>>>>  good sense of it by then, for discussion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 16:50:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC