W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: p1: Via and gateways

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:27:45 +1000
Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <74FF747A-D93A-436D-ACFB-F72BFFBBA2A4@mnot.net>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>

On 23/04/2013, at 4:43 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> Then I would propose this addition :
>   Multiple Via field values represent each proxy or gateway that has
>   forwarded the message.  Each recipient MUST append its information
>   such that the end result is ordered according to the sequence of
> -  forwarding applications.
> +  forwarding applications. A gateway MAY simply relay any existing Via
> +  header field if it does not change the HTTP version, but it MUST NOT
> +  remove it.

This is already covered further down:

> A proxy or gateway may combine an ordered subsequence of Via header field entries into a single such entry if the entries have identical received-protocol values.

The question I was raising was specific: can we relax the requirement for a gateway to add Via to responses if there isn't already one present?

Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 03:28:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC