W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: p1: HTTP(S) URIs and fragment identifiers

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:47:34 +1000
Message-Id: <9582B7B6-82B9-472E-9E35-B6113466D138@mnot.net>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Now:
  http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/451

On 20/04/2013, at 2:07 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> P1 sections 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 define the HTTP and HTTPS URI schemes without fragment identifiers.
> 
> While it's true that HTTP sends these URIs without fragids "on the wire" in the request-target, the schemes *do* allow fragids pretty much everywhere else they're used (including some places in HTTP, e.g., the Location header).
> 
> Given that this is going to be the definition for these URI schemes, and we already require that the fragid be omitted in the request-target, shouldn't the syntax allow a fragment identifier?
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 03:48:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC