- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:52:00 +1000
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Recorded as <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/445>. On 20/04/2013, at 2:07 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > p1 section 6.7 defines the Upgrade header, but no where does it say anything about relative preference. > > Should we define (or at least allow) for the ordering to be semantically significant? It seems to me that if we end up using this, and there are a few different variants of HTTP/2 (e.g., "normal" vs "mobile"), it'd be nice to rely on ordering here. > > Cheers, > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 07:52:25 UTC