W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: p1: Upgrade ordering (possible HTTP/2 impact)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:52:00 +1000
Message-Id: <DD80B7A5-FFDF-4540-B6CD-D69B711B1CF0@mnot.net>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Recorded as <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/445>.


On 20/04/2013, at 2:07 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> p1 section 6.7 defines the Upgrade header, but no where does it say anything about relative preference.
> 
> Should we define (or at least allow) for the ordering to be semantically significant? It seems to me that if we end up using this, and there are a few different variants of HTTP/2 (e.g., "normal" vs "mobile"), it'd be nice to rely on ordering here.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 07:52:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC