- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:11:27 +1200
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- CC: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 19/04/2013 6:56 p.m., Roberto Peon wrote: > +1 > > +1. Amos > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu > <mailto:w@1wt.eu>> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 08:27:21AM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > We can either: > > > > - make it a MUST > > - document what the exceptional circumstances are that cause the > SHOULD (but I don't think it's that kind of SHOULD) > > - downgrade it to an "ought to" > > > > I do note that we say "generate" there (which I missed before, > sorry); in our > > terminology, that means you DON'T need to fix it up when > forwarding it; it's > > only when you're actually creating the element that this applies. > > Ah OK then I agree with a MUST as well. > > +1 then :-) > > Willy > >
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 12:11:58 UTC