W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:46:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNcAYrZ328Mgh8nyZBNF1bPvdc002o9UjS7QHV0k3tYLHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Long term, yes, absolutely.
But, realistically, today we need to deal with the HUGE set of clients who
won't be getting an update to their stack in the next 10 years...
-=R


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:45:11 +0200, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>> If we break down the arbitrary layer barrier and inject some history into
>> the algorithm, in this case via SETTINGS, you get something more powerful
>> than a default constant.
>>
>
> Shouldn't the first option be to attempt injecting this history without
> breaking layers, like adding a TCP option?
>
> /Martin Nilsson
>
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 03:47:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC