W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: 3.3.1 Frame Header: Purpose of 1-bit reserved field?

From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 05:43:12 +0000
To: "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, "'ietf-http-wg@w3.org'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <em510058b6-8c4a-4e11-9597-f756ef5ed08d@bombed>

future proofing?  E.g. if we need to move to another format or size for 
stream ID?


------ Original Message ------
From: "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: "'ietf-http-wg@w3.org'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 13/04/2013 12:48:46 p.m.
Subject: 3.3.1 Frame Header: Purpose of 1-bit reserved field?
>3.3.1. Frame Header
>
>   |R| Stream Identifier (31) |
>
>
>    R: A reserved 1-bit field. The semantics of this bit are not 
>defined.
>
>I was curious about the purpose for the 1-bit reserved field. Can it be 
>deleted and the Stream Identifier increased to 32 bits?
>
>https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/67
>
>
>Brian Raymor
>Senior Program Manager
>Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
>A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 13 April 2013 05:43:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:12 UTC