W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:08:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXABHR82EK=wsTq5KszVv7dMWrYQqtAJxjEApE1c3FnqA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 4 December 2012 15:05, Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
>>    6.  If this is a request message and none of the above are true, then
>>        the message body length is zero (no message body is present).
>
> I think it should simply state
>
>     6.  If this is a request message and none of the above are true, then
>         the message contains no body.

Is it really useful to distinguish between no body and body with no
content?  I can't imagine a use for such a distinction.
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 23:08:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 December 2012 23:08:31 GMT