W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest, "5.3 If-Range"

From: Thomas Fossati <TFossati@velocix.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:41:25 +0000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DA86AAEF6E448540808AFA696EA47E5A4009968D@EXB01-MLT.corp.velocix.com>
Mark, Yves,

On 15/11/2012 06:49, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>It says that if the validator does not match, the entire representation
>should be sent; what's the issue?

Issue was who wins between the two (i.e. the unmatched validator or the
"bad" range specification), which is clearly the unmatched validator since
the range specification does not apply to the current resource state.

Thank you.
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:41:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:41:58 GMT