Re: on DNS records

multiple ports are fine by me.. just not limited to 80.

in general, whether this is a-p, upgrade, or srv, this is also the spot to
mux between tls as well as draft versions of the protocol. (i.e. upgrade:
http2-draft-00-tls)

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

>
> On 15/11/2012, at 11:54 AM, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:
> >
> > - Are we advertising that port 80 is capable of HTTP/2, or an alternate
> port for HTTP/2, or (capable of) both?
> >
> > imo it has to be an arbitrary port.. if you send anything other than
> http/1 on port 80 across the general internet you'll get some breakage.
>
> Agreed... however, I don't see a reason to make it impossible to say "I
> support HTTP/2 on port 80 too", so the client can optimistically try to use
> it first (as long as it can handle breakage).
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>