W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: on DNS records

From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:18:45 +0100
Message-ID: <50A3EE95.5090905@cisco.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 11/14/12 8:13 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 14 November 2012 11:09, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>> That's a fair point.  Question: how would you handle SRV with
>> http://www.example.com:49080?
> That was raised in the meeting.  SRV isn't enough for that reason
> alone.  I know too many hosts that operate on different ports.
> Obviously, each port could be given a new name, but that eventually
> leads to an increase in the number of wildcard certificates out there.

Thanks.  So you would prefer some other record that simply indicates
what version runs on what port and dump transport protocol?  What do
others think?

Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:19:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:07 UTC