W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:13:32 +0100
Message-ID: <5090CF9C.4060009@gmx.de>
To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
CC: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2012-10-30 21:40, Zhong Yu wrote:
> Got it. In the spec,
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-21#section-8.2
>> Additional header fields define metadata about the selected representation, which might differ from the representation included in the message for responses to some state-changing methods
>
> So if the current representation has ETag=v1, and PUT sends a new
> representation to which the server assigns ETag=v2, the response to
> PUT may contain ETag of the old representation. (This was not in
> RFC2616)
> ...

Why would it contain the old ETag?

> ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 07:14:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 31 October 2012 07:14:11 GMT