>
>
>> So I think there should be another LC, optimally after we are done with
>> the HTTPbis WGLCs.
>>
>
> So I hear this was approved in the meantime without another round of
> review. This is bad.
You needed to have brought this up a lot sooner.
>
> For instance, the newly introduced Preference-Applied header field is
> defined as:
>
> Preference-Applied = "Preference-Applied" ":" 1#token
>
> and has the example:
>
> Response:
>
> HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> Content-Type: application/json
> Preference-Applied: return=representation
> Content-Location: /my-document
>
> {"a": 1}
>
> But the "token" ABNF production doesn't include "=".
>
> There may be more problems like these. Please go back to LC.
No. Please work out any issues with James, and they can be fixed in AUTH48
(which won't happen until the httpbis docs are done anyway). That
shouldn't be a problem. But work them out now, before anyone forgets, and
let me know the result so I can be sure the changes get in.
Barry
Received on Friday, 26 October 2012 12:18:17 UTC