W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

RE: HTTP Header Compaction Results

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:14:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNf5qTQhG06f2hd6DtSdevYJFBuB+gwHiwJHM3079wHrAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
My github repo has some code for parsing the .har files. In python and js
it is trivial  (around 3 loc) to parse them. For my c++ code, I invoke
(fork)  the python to parse them and then put them in simplified http/1
header format and pipe it into the c++ code.

-=R
On Oct 25, 2012 1:13 AM, "RUELLAN Herve" <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James M Snell [mailto:jasnell@gmail.com]
> > Sent: mercredi 24 octobre 2012 21:44
> > To: Mark Nottingham
> > Cc: Patrick McManus; Roberto Peon; Amos Jeffries; ietf-http-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >       On 25/10/2012, at 5:00 AM, Patrick McManus
> > <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:
> >       >
> >       > for reference https://developer.mozilla.org/en-
> > US/docs/NSS_Key_Log_Format
> >
> >       Thanks; I looked for that before, but couldn't find it. Should have
> > asked.
> >
> >       I agree that the logs should be 'raw'; we can always post-process
> (as
> > long as we do it in a uniform manner :)
> >
> >       How would people prefer to store them? I've been storing them as
> > just text files, one per direction per stream (e.g., "response headers
> on this
> > connection to 1.2.3.4"), with header blocks delimited by a blank line.
> > However, IIRC someone mentioned HAR as well -- any preferences?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > text files would work just fine.
>
> I agree that text files are OK.
>
> HAR could also work, but are somewhat more complex to process. Moreover I
> think it's easier to write a HAR to text files translator than the reverse.
>
> Hervé.
>
> > - James
> >
> >
> >       Cheers,
> >
> >
> >       --
> >       Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 17:15:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 25 October 2012 17:15:24 GMT