W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

draft-kfall-httpbis-server-ranges [was: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta]

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:32:23 +1100
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0AE0EC57-F2BC-4DAD-B939-C07E2B584D53@mnot.net>
To: "Fall, Kevin" <kfall@qti.qualcomm.com>
Kevin,

On 23/10/2012, at 3:11 PM, "Fall, Kevin" <kfall@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:

> Would like a chance to briefly bring up the range / partial delivery issue
> I mentioned on the list.
> [and what's behind 
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kfall-httpbis-server-ranges-00.txt]


We can spend a bit of time on it in the "related work" item of the session on Monday, yes.

To make the use case a bit more concrete, and make sure I understand it, one example AIUI would be a request for

  Range: bytes=100-

to which you return, say:

  Content-Range: bytes 100-200/1000
  ETag: "1234"

and then to a subseqent, identical request

  Content-Range: bytes 100-400/1000
  ETag: "1234"

Correct?

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 03:32:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 25 October 2012 03:32:55 GMT