W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: WGLC issue: (minor?) scope of client/server attributes (specifically: downgrades) in p1

From: Nils Goroll <slink@schokola.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:20:05 +0200
Message-ID: <5087CEE5.1020207@schokola.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

> A UA might decide to "remember" the downgrade longer than the scope of a single connection.

Then the implication would be that all actual server processes behind an address 
or fqdn had to support the same version(s).

Also, this would not be consistent with the definition for upgrades, which I'd 
find confusion.

Thanks, Nils
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 11:20:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 October 2012 11:20:35 GMT