W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-http-prefer-14.txt> (Prefer Header for HTTP) to Proposed Standard

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 10:22:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXkHdVcK4fa0p2MPox7RTruOQCWVa7UCuPNLy-b4yUiVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, SM <sm@resistor.net>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 5 October 2012 08:12, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 3.4.  The "wait" Preference
> I'm not totally convinced that taking the Date request header field into
> account is necessary given the additional complexity; what do others think?

I said as much in my GenART review:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg07790.html

Having had experience implementing this exact feature, relying on Date
isn't going to work.
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 17:22:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 5 October 2012 17:22:34 GMT