W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2012


From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:27:09 -0400
Message-ID: <506C4B3D.6030806@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

I'm working on draft draft-murchison-webdav-prefer which describes how 
the return-minimal and return-representation apply to WebDAV/CalDAV 
methods.  My work is primarily CalDAV-centric but we are trying to make 
it generic to WebDAV and its derivatives.

One of the issues that keeps coming up is a way for the client to 
differentiate between two  cases:

- the server doesn't return a representation because it ignored or 
doesn't support the return-representation preference

- the server understood the preference but didn't return a 
representation because it didn't change from what was in the request

One possible solution is for the server to return a Vary: Prefer header 
to indicate that the server understood the preference, thereby allowing 
the client to infer what the lack of a representation in the response means.

The next question is, does any such mandate or recommendation, if 
required, belong in my webdav-prefer draft or in the base Prefer spec?


Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 14:27:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:07 UTC