- From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:29:46 +0200
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Amos, On 10/3/12 3:54 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > 4) I'll stick my neck out and voice it. Cross-request LZ compression > needs to go. > > The other drafts proposed a few alternative options there, per-header > differential add/replace/remove flags. > IIRC Robert was working on something there as well? I don't think you're sticking your neck out very far ;-) Mike had sent a message to this list about this issue on the 14th of September. While I could see some small potential for abuse within the same security context, I would be more concerned if a dictionary were shared across contexts, where one might have different properties or the risk of MITM is elevated for one reason or another. I didn't think either of these scenarios was seriously considered in SPDY. Am I not being paranoid enough? Eliot
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 06:30:23 UTC