W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Optimizations vs Functionality vs Architecture

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:06:16 +0000
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <89828.1345615576@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CABP7RbcMO3yL3D0vtnPmU63CNKgYLzMa+Eveo52edBVBK8m72Q@mail.gmail.com>
, James M Snell writes:

>The more I read through this conversation, the more I worry that all this
>talk about zero-latency upgrade negotiation through multiple hops of
>arbitrary 1.1 or 2.0 servers is going to lead to significantly more
>complexity than originally hoped -- and not the acceptable good kind of
>complexity that delivers real benefits in the end.

That's my conclusion too.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 06:06:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 August 2012 06:07:06 GMT