W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Semantics of HTTPS

From: Jonathan Ballard <dzonatas@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:33:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAPAK-7z41h_qko2MjjwyY8cPUdkwM6=bOkc0tNPQAWKtJpArw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Ah then, .os is available for discussion here. That makes sense with
CONNECT URL.

On Monday, August 6, 2012, Stephen Farrell wrote:

>
>
> On 08/07/2012 01:45 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >
> > Today those rights are just words on a piece of paper describing some
> > fantasy land that does not exist. Recalls marks assumption that he
> > *knew* CONNECT provided end-to-end security. Mark you live in .au still?
> > then your CONNECT is being decrypted. .cn, .sa, .in. .us, rq? same.
>
> I think evidence of that would be useful.
>
> Thanks,
> S.
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 01:33:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 August 2012 01:34:03 GMT