W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Re[2]: Moving forward with HTTP/2.0: proposed charter

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:45:36 +0000
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
cc: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <68395.1344242736@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <20120806083754.GB3961@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:
>On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:11:35AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>> >2.0 client talks to 2.0 local proxy talking to 1.1 internet.
>> 
>> That's not a terribly interesting use-case is it ?
>
>This use case should prevail in mobile environments. Your smartphone
>should have an explicit proxy configured (instead of passing via an
>interception proxy) that will also save it from round trips caused
>by DNS requests.

But is 1.1 vs. 2.0 proxy really going to make that much of a difference ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 08:46:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 August 2012 08:46:09 GMT