- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:30:30 +0000
- To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
- cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CABaLYCtNzTZjUPgknfNtjwhkUopf3gaHQ6SmBGLAywu07WAB1g@mail.gmail.com> , Mike Belshe writes: >--f46d0407178542016504c64fa910 >> I also have trouble with the use of compression over the headers for two >> reasons: >> >> 1) While we know that compression can work wonders on entity bodies, it >> obscures the headers which are critical for inspection and manipulation by >> everybody down the message path. >> > >So far, this has not been a problem. ... becuase sites which needed such inspection and manipulation deliberately stayed away from SPDY because of the TLS+Compression requirement. Absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 3 August 2012 05:30:56 UTC