W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: FYI... Binary Optimized Header Encoding for SPDY

From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 23:24:45 +0300
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <48B73A9A-B679-4961-A23B-A9F0174ECB6C@checkpoint.com>

On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:

> 
> On 8/2/12 10:27 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>> On Aug 2, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> 
>>> Martin,
>>> 
>>>> We could always USE ASN.1 (and PER). 
>>> Thank you for bringing home the point that there are complexity
>>> tradeoffs for doing all of this.
>> Why?  It makes things so simple:
> 
> Let's just see if it stays simple by the time it's done.

Please, let's not see that. Besides, if the PKIX people can be kept away, we'll be fine.
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 20:25:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 2 August 2012 20:25:22 GMT