On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: > > On 8/1/12 10:21 PM, Adrien W. de Croy wrote: > > > > I don't really like using 32 bit for TV headers though. That won't > > work for dates. I'd prefer a byte for value TYPE, e.g. > > 00 = 32 bit integer > > 01 = 64 bit integer > > 02 = datetime (possibly just 64 bit ns since epoch) > > 03 = text > > 04 = binary/opaque > > 05 - 7F extension types (length prefixed value) > > I have a nagging concern that we not reinvent ASN.1 in this process. > +1! "Better is the enemy of good". Mike > > Eliot >Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 16:42:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 2 August 2012 16:43:05 GMT