W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Re[2]: HTTP2 Expression of Interest : Squid

From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:45:09 +0200
To: "Mike Belshe" <mike@belshe.com>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.wibchjpwiw9drz@uranium.quadriga.com>
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:39:08 +0200, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com> wrote:


>
> Fair enough, you've presented an argument for who doesn't want push.   
> But this is a tiny tiny fraction of people.  I would not sacrifice  
> billions of >internet users that do want images and JS for the needs of  
> a very small few.  The very small few won't be broken by using push -  
> they'll still get their >pages just fine and can RST the streams they  
> don't want.

I've presented an argument from one that would like to see push, but think  
the current SPDY implementation is too simplistic. Just having the client  
white list content types for push would go a long way.

>
> I think we should build "fast by default".

I think we should build "fast for everyone".

/Martin Nilsson

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 13:45:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 31 July 2012 13:45:55 GMT