Re: Straw-man for our next charter

On 30.07.2012 06:55, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> So, we need to have some more detail here.
>
> My take is that we're already implicitly starting from HTTP/1.1.
> I.e., I'd be very surprised (and concerned) if we found ourselves
> rewriting any of parts 2-7; all of our changes *should* be confined 
> to
> part 1.
>

I do see us writing an "HTTP 1.1 and 2.0 translation" document though 
which updates P2-7.

> And, while I can imagine starting from part 1 and changing it
> section-by-section, I do wonder if it offers significant benefit over
> writing something that just aims to replace p1.
>
> All of that said -- it's pretty clear that the current proposals are
> not written as analogues to p1, and probably need to move in that
> direction.
>
> Cheers,

+100. Ack.

AYJ