Re: RFC6585+HTTP/2.0 := 101

Thanks for the notice.

My intent is to stay on-topic, and my post appeared like it leaped. We
already argued canonicalization, and its process modes, around ~1990, so I
thought there was no issue about that. I haven't been bound by BSD
given prevalent authority since then, so sorry.

On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Amos Jeffries wrote:

>
> I think the thing to notice here is the 295% *increase* in bandwidth
> consumption for content meta data. After removing the unnecessary
> whitespace.
>
> AYJ
>
>