W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: RFC6585+HTTP/2.0 := 101

From: Jonathan Ballard <dzonatas@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 07:40:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAPAK-4ieb3mrKkyDR7q4DjaZmKALhzvbwAg3TP-raqXTCCasw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thanks for the notice.

My intent is to stay on-topic, and my post appeared like it leaped. We
already argued canonicalization, and its process modes, around ~1990, so I
thought there was no issue about that. I haven't been bound by BSD
given prevalent authority since then, so sorry.

On Thursday, July 26, 2012, Amos Jeffries wrote:

>
> I think the thing to notice here is the 295% *increase* in bandwidth
> consumption for content meta data. After removing the unnecessary
> whitespace.
>
> AYJ
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 July 2012 14:40:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 July 2012 14:40:46 GMT