W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: [ietf-http-wg] <none>

From: Andy Wenk <andy@nms.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:22:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CADA9kr9++KWLwD5K6qkjt0eaKKaGLgBamaEQq6AkpGFVyQrvEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi Samuel,

On 20 July 2012 13:01, Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se> wrote:
> After following the general dissuasion the last couple of days I have
> a few questions/thought.
>
> How is statelessness affected by introducing session headers and more
> persistent connections for multiplexing and server push?
>
> Have the requirements for REST APIs been considered? I have not seen
> any one mentioning this aspect of http2, but it should be since if
> current trends continue API calls will generate more traffic then
> direct end-user browsing in the future.

could you point out what you mean here? I don't get the direct context
to the HTTP/2 protocol

> Much effort is put in to solving bandwidth and number of connections
> problems, should we also consider how resources could be
> specified/marked as offline available. I don´t think this is problems
> of the future though since bandwidth, battery and connectivity gets
> better all the time.
>
> It has been a flood of emails the last couple of days so I have not
> ben able to read all in detail, i.e. I might have missed if there has
> been discussions on these questions/thought previously, in that case
> I´m sorry for bringing them up again.
>
> Regards
> //Samuel
>

Cheers

Andy

-- 
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 11:23:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 July 2012 11:23:23 GMT