W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Our old friends, weak ETags

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:58:22 +0000
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <21925.1342771102@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <7C4B2D6A-4847-49ED-A6E1-1DA8CF672A00@tzi.org>, Carsten Bormann writ
es:
>On Jul 20, 2012, at 09:25, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> binary
>
>See also RFC 5905 section 6.

Yes.

Although I think going full NTP is overkill, in particular because
timestamps tend to have very high entropy in the lower bits.

I think chosing a 16bit fraction will last us 20 years, but more
importantly, expanding a 16bit fraction to 32bits is just a matter
of stick on more bits, whereas a 16bit count of milliseconds is
a nightmare to extend.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 07:58:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 July 2012 07:58:53 GMT