W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Mandatory encryption

From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:07:19 -0400
Message-ID: <1342616839.30417.46.camel@ds9>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@gmail.com>, grahame@healthintersections.com.au, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 08:09 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:22:24PM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> 
> The issue with HTTP/2 will indeed be the same as with IPv6 : HTTP/2 will
> be deployed between the browser and the load balancer, and everything
> behind will remain HTTP/1 due to the added nuisances of deploying 2.0
> everywhere.

Except we know that in the very near future SPDY adoption will have
reached far more people than IPv6 ever has. So, unlike IPv6, there is a
big demand to solve the problems it addresses.

>  Almost nobody does IPv6 between LB and server nowadays, it's
> added cost for no benefit.
> 

of course spdy has lots of benefits. key difference :)
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 13:08:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 18 July 2012 13:08:02 GMT