- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:03:48 +0000
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In message <CAP+FsNchmj8iLCsbPrk+Af3XVog69ZoKvP3eBVq2NtQ+ptygRw@mail.gmail.com> , Roberto Peon writes: >I'm not particularly enamored of the deflate stuff as a whole solution. I >think it is just part of a whole solution in a solution space than needs >more exploration. To be honest: If I were trying to see and measure benefits from smaller HTTP requests, I would probably also start out with deflate, just to get some numbers in, but as a permanent solution it's clearly a no-go. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 08:04:15 UTC