W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: SPDY Header Frames

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:03:48 +0000
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <62589.1342512228@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CAP+FsNchmj8iLCsbPrk+Af3XVog69ZoKvP3eBVq2NtQ+ptygRw@mail.gmail.com>
, Roberto Peon writes:

>I'm not particularly enamored of the deflate stuff as a whole solution. I
>think it is just part of a whole solution in a solution space than needs
>more exploration.

To be honest:  If I were trying to see and measure benefits from smaller
HTTP requests, I would probably also start out with deflate, just to get
some numbers in, but as a permanent solution it's clearly a no-go.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 08:04:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 July 2012 08:04:21 GMT