W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: SPDY Header Frames

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:59:49 +0000
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
cc: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <62550.1342511989@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <50051A91.1010401@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
>On 2012-07-17 09:44, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
>> ...
>> But a much, much better solution in this day and age is to only allow
>> one encoding, UTF-8. That by definition includes US-ASCII, covers all
>> the world's characters, and is what HTML is moving towards (with quite
>> surprising speed these days). And while in HTML (and other content
>> formats), non-ASCII is extremely widespread, in HTTP, it is not, and
>> having more than one encoding is needlessly complicated.
>> ...
>
>*If* we make a breaking change with respect to character encoding 
>schemes, this is indeed the change to make.

Indeed, and a change I think HTTP/2.0 should make, in light of a
20 year design lifetime.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 08:00:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 July 2012 08:00:34 GMT