W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Implementing SPDY, is a day a meaningful criteria?

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:18:47 +0000
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <59034.1342448327@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CAMm+LwhkvtPOVV=hi2TcYQ9F46Pf459m4Pj309VkHg6NOOYqyg@mail.gmail.com>
, Phillip Hallam-Baker writes:

>What I care about is not how long it takes to
>implement but if I can implement on restricted chips like embedded
>control systems. So code footprint is more important to me than
>time-to-implement. And I think it is a more objectively fair test.

I think it is a good point, if we have any hope of getting rid of
HTTP/1.0, HTTP/2.0 must penetrate all the way down into access points,
home routers and other embedded consumer products.

NIST has used similar criteria for AES and SHA3 beauty-contests.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 16 July 2012 14:19:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 July 2012 14:19:21 GMT