On 2012-07-15 12:19, tom wrote: > Support on "My view is that SPDY layering should be separated and the > non-HTTP layer considered as an alternative transport for HTTP similar > to TCP, UDP, STCP, CoAP and HTCP which all seek to relay HTTP messages. > Only the HTTP specific syntax and framing improvements should be > considered by the WG as input to HTTP/2 specifications." > ... +1 > BTW, we have been running HTTP over UDP (scheme as HTTP) successfully. > ... Out of curiosity: who is "we"? Best regards, JulianReceived on Sunday, 15 July 2012 10:30:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 15 July 2012 10:30:33 GMT