In message <CABP7RbepWH4ahSPHDU_M_w0tRVz_RRm1FV-jM_Y72=YHCVqO0g@mail.gmail.com> , James M Snell writes: >As discussed within draft-tarreau-httpbis-network-friendly-00, and as has >been mentioned several times in discussion on list, handling of headers >within the current SPDY framing, and in particular the layering of HTTP/1.1 >messages into SPDY frames is less than optimal. [...] While I appreciate your willingness to keep trying to modify SPDY, I think it is premature to do so, certainly until we know what HTTP/2.0 should actually do and how it should do it. For instance if we decide to do the envelope/substance split, (probably envelope/metadata/substance actually), that has pretty big implications for the requirements to the actual protocol. Such fundamental questions should be resolved before we waste time trying to fine-tune representations. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 22:27:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 13 July 2012 22:27:51 GMT